Development Vs Evolution – The Excellent Debate  

  • Category Category: Biology
  • Comment Comments: 33
  • View View: 55
Report this Article
Table of contents:
  1. Article about Development Vs Evolution – The Excellent Debate  
  2. Watch Evolution Video. click here...
  3. Question and answer about Development Vs Evolution – The Excellent Debate  . click here!
  4. Some product related to Evolution. click here...
  5. Latest news about Development Vs Evolution – The Excellent Debate  . click here!

Be The First To Read What The Experts Are Saying About Development Vs Evolution – The Excellent Debate  .

Article by Fabien Is the truth of creation or evolution? Darwin or God? Which the Earth come from? http://www.bible-tube.com

It is funny how some discussion polarize people, and nothing much more than a debate involving the creationists and evolutionists. These are two opposing viewpoints and in some respects but they related.Creationists feel that the planet as we know it is produced by God. He built all the points that correspond to a particular set, and that almost everything we see in this world there are now only with the phrase God’s power. Earth as we know it’s very complicated and somehow everything is interdependent. Despite the complexity of the existing stability, buy and objective for every little thing that we see around us, which shows carefully prepared, set up and other aspects execution.On though we have the evolutionists who feel that everyday life is defined through random chemical interactions. Lifestyle triggered by an event that brings together all the right elements at the right time at right place. The existence began as a single cell amoeba, adapted, modified and developed around thousands of years a lot to many living organisms, creatures and daily life of existing plants is days.Therefore Creationists believe that the universe as we know it’s a definite aspect and very well-defined approach while Evolutionists believe that this all came by chance, and every little thing that has happened since, which includes a large explosion, completely random. So let’s look at two positions and see how they pile up.The situation that evolutionists have with creation is about the inability of people to prove the existence of God. Evolutionists believe in the scientific techniques and that until something can be empirically measured or perceived by the five senses, then no. So because of the fact you can not measure, see, touch, smell, hear or style of Allah then he is not able to exist and therefore Creationism is also fallacy.Now there are many issues that you can not see by using the senses that we know exist, for a case in point ideas, feelings or emotions. These items can not be perceived by the senses or measured empirically, but we know they exist because we can see the benefits of their actions and behavior. If we apply the scientific strategy for these factors then we can argue logically they do not exist and underestimate those who believe that they do.But let us also use scientific techniques to what Evolutionists believe that. Is where they are credible from the standpoint of empirical? The essence of evolution is that every type of everyday life are formulated from a single cell amoeba over many generations is designed to cats, dogs, fish, lizards, insects, man, and so on. The weakness in this often inability to find a so-called “missing link.” Namely, the type of crossover that saw monkeys into adulthood so that the principle males.Even site link is missing just run an effective transformation from ape to human. For each species of animal, reptile, insect or fish species there should be a crossover. Teaching the popular notion of evolution states that the crawling stage of some fish from the sea and grew to become amphibians, which later became the lizard, which then becomes smaller animals, which later became a four-legged animal is bigger, which then stood up to turn into two beings legged two-legged and gradually became a man. Equivalent evolutionary chain is also a must have for every other species on the planet now.For right of each species that were there wanted to be a species crossover to get from one to the next. There are demands to become a hyperlink where by there is half fish and half-lizard, or fifty percent-cow and half horse, dog and 50 percent-fifty-percent-one else, and so forth. We do not seek to link a single less, but some 1000 or lost thousands and thousands of inbound links that connect each and every stage of the evolution of species of each and every. There must be really a continuous chain that can be traced progressively from a single cell amoeba to all today.But everyday life sciences complex type what to say about this? If evolution is a scientific fact it must be able to be proven conclusively. But the archaeological record shows nothing. Not a single missing link ever found between any two species, but for everyday life there, as we know it today, there must be millions of links returned in archaeological documents. The world must be littered with hyperlinks so that the few who would not be possible to argue, but there none.On top of that, we know from DNA that mixing species can not take place. You can not mix the DNA of horses and a man to develop a centaur. And if there are mutations in some species do not have the skills to breed, but died in their personal generation.So if you can not prove evolution by science then it does not exist, using logic evolutionists use to God. Even Charles Darwin’s great perception for mobile phones as “Theory” of Evolution relative of actuality, and he admitted about the DNA he could not have been postulated in the concept of the initial area. And after all this time evolution is taught as if it has become an undeniable truth and absolute discretion, without any science to back it strengthens up.So let’s look at the science and see what that tells us. Scientists have spent quite a few hundred years of studying the universe and the planet’s organic to reveal its strategy. In their study of physics, biology, chemistry, astronomy, mathematics and all other weapons of science they found an ideal buy and stability. They did not find the likelihood or randomness in the organic planet, but the issues are so ordered and maintained as appears to be the work of a pure intelligence.So if anything all that we see the science that in fact reinforces the Creationists who imagine that God designed the planet in accordance with approach the divine. They feel he developed every species of plant and animal life in accordance with the shape, which is supported by scientific discoveries in DNA. And science have been entirely unable to validate the presence of one of the hundreds of thousands of species crosses archaeological importance in the document to validate the above evolution.On that, as shown above, we know that there are some points but we can not even measure them empirically or see them with our senses, because we see the results they have through action or behavior. Creationists see the world about them as God’s actions and behavior, provide evidence of the fact that God exists only because the universe complete its function arms.But Evolutionists have no scientific evidence to assist their placement, as there is no evidence that evolution occurred. There is no science to back it up and so should continue to be a “theory” that cause concern: why is taught as an actuality which provides a unique back to the stage of this dialogue?. It’s funny how some discussion of the polarization of people and there is nothing much more than this debate, and stay on a few strategies exist other types of equations. Creationists rely on faith as their mainstay, with a sense of regret and sometimes humiliation of Evolutionists, even though the scientific record backs up much of what Creationists think. Evolutionists on the other side does not exist in a scientific file to return to the position they hold fast to the firm, which I think shows they must recognize the basic … faith! Hmm …


About the Author

Fabien is amazing and intelligent graduate college mission hills of strong black evangelism in South Dakota. Is creation or evolution is true? Darwin or God? Where the earth comes from? Fabien is currently a missionary in Paris France and southern Florida

Best buy products

Web Traffic Evolution & 3 Other Products
Discover The Revolutionary Strategies To Instantly Drive Unlimited Traffic To Your Websites! Join Me And Earn 75% Commision! Http://www.petedwilliams.com/affiliates.php Also Check Out My Other 3 Products To Promote. Traffic Videos, List Building Etc
Web Traffic Evolution & 3 Other Products

The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution
In 2008, a Gallup poll showed that 44 percent of Americans believed God had created man in his present form within the last 10,000…
Evolution: A View from the 21st Century (FT Press Science)
This is the eBook version of the printed book.James A. Shapiro’s Evolution: A View from the 21st Century proposes an important new…
Evolution (DK Eyewitness Books)
The most trusted nonfiction series on the market, Eyewitness Books provide an in-depth, comprehensive look at their subjects with …
Evolution: A View from the 21st Century (FT Press Science)
James A. Shapiro’s Evolution: A View from the 21st Century proposes an important new paradigm for understanding biological evoluti…

Video Illustration

Addressing some misconceptions and explaining some of the basics.


Consultation…

Assuming that the theory of evolution is true, how is it that apes still exist? Did they choose not to evolve? I am not dismissing the theory just curious as to why they (apes, chimps, etc.) are not extinct, and there is a need to find a missing link that is no long with us. Now, before I get attacked I want to make it clear that I have yet to draw my own conclusion, and I am searching for answers from both sides of the fence (evolution/creation). Thanks in advance!!
Question by joe sniffy

Best answer:

Answer by chlaxman17
Well first we did not evolve from the current apes, rather we all have a common ancestor. Next, even if we did evolve from modern apes, we do not necessarily compete for resources so both could continue on. Just because a species evolves does not mean that the ancestor becomes extinct.

Give your answer to this question below!

Tags

, , , , , , ,

mainoonp Article's Source: http://www.newsarticlesever.com/development-vs-evolution-the-excellent-debate%c2%a0%c2%a0
Author:

  • authorBy:
  • writerPosted On: November 10, 2011
  • livePublished articles: 4

Comments (33)

  • ObjectiSkeptic
    ObjectiSkeptic Say (November 10, 2011 at 2:36 am)

    An omnipotent god would create a logically impossible planet made out of ethereal immaterial diamonds somewhere out in the depths of an abstract realm of existence that defies all conception. Space is underrated. o_O

    Evening, LORD! Have you been taking your anger management classes lately?

  • thediamondplanet
    thediamondplanet Say (November 10, 2011 at 3:28 am)

    @coolgreyoneabby …ughh no that is my spiritual name. the diamond planet is my planet and the pulsar is the one who steals my diamonds and destroys, my planet is one of the heavens i created.

  • coolgreyoneabby
    coolgreyoneabby Say (November 10, 2011 at 3:43 am)

    @thediamondplanet Hi God! Hey God, If I were God, my name on You tube would be….. God. Just that, God. Why did you pick “thediamondplanet?” God is much cleaner. You should change it to God. Bye God!

  • thediamondplanet
    thediamondplanet Say (November 10, 2011 at 4:29 am)

    im GOD, evolution does not exist. manifestation exist but if you dont understand who i am, then your not going to believe in manifestation either. but yea i am the LORD your GOD and im here to tell you evolution is a lie. its that simple. they dont even know all life and light came from a blackhole in the beginning. if i wasnt GOD, then how do i know that? that is unheard of in the scientific world…we came from a blackhole…they would disagree with that real quick..but i did and i am he.

  • coolgreyoneabby
    coolgreyoneabby Say (November 10, 2011 at 4:46 am)

    @lymalt Where do you get this bestiality stuff from? You have been watching Fox News too much.

  • coolgreyoneabby
    coolgreyoneabby Say (November 10, 2011 at 5:27 am)

    @lymalt It is not science that is having a debate, it is this odd group called Republicans that are creating the illusion of debate. They did it for tobacco causing cancer in the 70′s. They have been doing it with evolution for decades and now they are doing it again with Anthropogenic Climate Change. They don’t really debate within the peer reviewed scientific community. They take their argument to the court of public opinion where most don’t know any better.

  • sykeo123
    sykeo123 Say (November 10, 2011 at 5:34 am)

    @lymalt
    wish to know my education level you can view my profile.

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 6:24 am)

    And then the fairy tale start to be supported by many evidences. The behavior of bestiality is observed in our modern society. There are abundant of evidences of this ape-like fossils, suggesting that there must be a culture associated by bestiality behavior. The current bestiality behaviour is only a remnant of the ancient culture. This fairy tale may be fairy tale, but I am just making a point that it is as absurd as evolution itself.

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 7:02 am)

    @coolgreyoneabby the fact that there are still debates anywhere indicate it is not yet a consensus. As I said, the problem is the origin of man suggested by evolution, not the whole theory. This is what evolutionist fail to demonstrate. What happens when you try to speak as if you know a lot can be seen from your next sentence “As far as my electron beam emitter, I tried to get my flux capacitor from Libya “, for which I don’t need to reply to this incoherent bullshit.

  • coolgreyoneabby
    coolgreyoneabby Say (November 10, 2011 at 7:51 am)

    @lymalt Evolution is the accepted scientific consensus therefore the case has already been made. You just have not looked up the data to realize it. So it is not up to me to show you the mountains of data. As far as my electron beam emitter, I tried to get my flux capacitor from Libya, but all I got was a box of used pinball machine parts., Ask your colleagues who are around 45. They will know exactly what the flux capacitor is. You must be younger than about 35.

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 8:06 am)

    There is a fairy tale like this. Once upon the time, there is pyschotic man who have sexual intercourse with monkey. An ape-like creature was born..and live his life as usual. When he died, million years later it was found and documented as the missing link of evolution. This story is quite interesting……

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 8:48 am)

    @coolgreyoneabby you mean anthropologist is hard science? wow…social science is all about speculation. But thanks anyway for telling me that, now I know that evolution is social science. No wonder… . =)

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 9:43 am)

    @coolgreyoneabby the problem is it is your burden of proof to show it to me, not the other way around.

    PS: electron beam emitter down last week? then you should be fired for that! the price is 1 Million Euro. Flux capacitor?what’s that? :p it is not related to Electron Beam lithography. Sounds like bullshit to me. You dont have to pretend to know a lot. The more you do that, the more it is apparent you are not doing science at all.

  • MidnightTea7
    MidnightTea7 Say (November 10, 2011 at 9:58 am)

    @Awake4Truth cont. including his belief that Earth is made in six parts out of land and one in water – a conclusion he’s drawn from Second Book Of Esdras.

    Also – for the sake of accuracy – Earth is not really a sphere. It’s an ellipsoid.

  • MidnightTea7
    MidnightTea7 Say (November 10, 2011 at 10:41 am)

    @Awake4Truth Ah, but Awake4Truth – don’t you know? Columbus was a devout Catholic XD So if he followed the Scripture he did it in “pagan” way, LOL. Anyway – my point is that the Bible wasn’t Columbus’ ‘inspiration to sail across the earth and prove that it’s not flat’. Most educated people of his time had valid reasons to believe it’s round. Thing is they had no idea what lied beyond known seas – and all of Columbus’ major assumptions about Earth’s geography were proven to be wrong.

  • Casshyr
    Casshyr Say (November 10, 2011 at 11:23 am)

    @lymalt ” i mean the debate on whether neanderthal and homo sapiens are separate race. Some even argue that the neaderthal is actually more advanced than homo sapiens.” => but you still haven’t answer me this: where do humans come from then? Where is the proof that we are somehow magically created without evolving? You can’t just keep throwing out alternative explanations! You need to provide evidence for your claims!

  • coolgreyoneabby
    coolgreyoneabby Say (November 10, 2011 at 11:55 am)

    @lymalt The real question was, why don’t you present your data for peer review and have the scientific consensus of evolution overturned? If all there is to the evolution of man are illustrations and deformed modern humans, that should be pretty easy to show to a group of anthropologists. PS my Electron beam emitter died last week, I have a new flux capacitor on order now. Don’t you hate it when that happens?

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 12:25 pm)

    what you said also implies a strange conclusion. So in your logic, you are not doing real science, since you are wasting time with other people in youtube? Actually I encourage you to do real research and real science, though. Doing research is challenging, tiring, but fun and rewarding too. Doing nanotechnology is better than thinking about evolution. We can play around with electron beam induced metal deposition as narrow as <10nm (a size of the electron beam spot and the resist molecule).

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 12:50 pm)

    @coolgreyoneabby there is nothing wrong for a researcher like me to have fun with youtube. I find this sentence strange “If you know how science works, why are you wasting your time with me on YouTube?”. so knowing science = not wasting time on you on youtube? =) The reason I “waste time” with you is because I am waiting for my electron beam lithography process in the cleanroom to get my sub-20nm pattern fabricated. Doing real science is fun, although I have to spend 8 hours in cleanroom.

  • coolgreyoneabby
    coolgreyoneabby Say (November 10, 2011 at 1:32 pm)

    @lymalt Something is wrong with this picture. Either you really don’t do science or you are religiously motivated or both. If you know how science works, why are you wasting your time with me on YouTube? Why not expose the fraud at the a peer reviewed anthropology meeting? If you are correct, it should not be hard to show. Then you would put this evolution myth to bed once and for all. OR you are just blowing smoke.

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 2:04 pm)

    @sykeo123 thank you for reminding me it is cro-magnon =). But that still doesn’t change the point. The way you reply indicates how educated you are. I hope you enjoy the humor since you find it funny.

  • sykeo123
    sykeo123 Say (November 10, 2011 at 2:14 pm)

    and again shows how these dishonest , uneducated theists should keep their mouth shut lol.

    When you start spewing about neanderthals and don’t know what species they were you just made yourself look that more stupid.

  • sykeo123
    sykeo123 Say (November 10, 2011 at 2:35 pm)

    @lymalt
    lolol?

    why are you trying to say neanderthals are homo sapiens? They aren’t.
    Cro-Magnon was.

    The only issue happens to be that you have no education.

  • lymalt
    lymalt Say (November 10, 2011 at 3:22 pm)

    @coolgreyoneabby astronomy is not found in CG, it is real and was taken from telescope, unlike evolution. The ‘data’ that you show me many many times, to be honest, does not show anything. I have repeatedly told this. We don’t even know whether neanderthal is more advanced than homo sapiens or not, let alone concluding that they are related in transitional sense. Skull shaping in infant was well documented in ancient Peru, but for you it may show the existence of advanced human being..

  • coolgreyoneabby
    coolgreyoneabby Say (November 10, 2011 at 3:35 pm)

    @lymalt ” What I merely see from evolutionary theory is the imaginative artwork of certain artist of what ancient species”. That just tells me that you have not bothered to do any real research before criticizing real data.

  • John R
    John R Say (November 10, 2011 at 4:20 pm)

    chlaxman is exactly right. Evolution does not mean replacement. Think of a branch forking.

  • kaylee
    kaylee Say (November 10, 2011 at 4:40 pm)

    I personally don’t believe in evolution. That we evolved from apes?! Get real. Would you want to think that one of your relatives swung on vines? Not me. But of course that’s my superiority complex speaking.

  • Escuerdo
    Escuerdo Say (November 10, 2011 at 5:01 pm)

    The apes that exist today have been evolving just as long as anything else.

    Things don’t “choose” to evolve or not. But they evolve differently. Evolution doesn’t go in a linear fashion from “higher to lower” either. Instead, different populations of one species tends to diverge into more than one species over time, and they survive as long as they are capable of utilizing their environment to grow and reproduce. Different populations evolve in different ways.

    The apes that were our ancestors are not the same ones that exist today. The ones that exist today are more like cousins, and they are each adapted to their own environment.

    The apes of today are, genetically speaking, no more similar to our common ancestors than we are (we infer this based on degrees of similarity different kinds of modern apes have to one another).

    Expecting that there should be no other kinds of apes because humans have evolved is like expecting that there should be no rifles once pistols were developed. Modern rifles and pistols both developed from earlier rifle-like guns, but they’re both different from the original and serve different functions.

  • kiphyn b
    kiphyn b Say (November 10, 2011 at 5:15 pm)

    Just look at Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton they are the missing and weakest link!

  • jonmcn49
    jonmcn49 Say (November 10, 2011 at 6:00 pm)

    Assuming that emigration is true, how is it that Europeans still exist? You need to sharpen your thinking a bit. Some great sites were given you; peruse them. Here are a couple more.

    http://www.talkorigins.org

    http://www.aboutdarwin.com

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Say (November 10, 2011 at 6:24 pm)

    The theory of evolution posits that evolution will happen whenever there is a useful/needed direction to go. We only evolve for purposes. Example: if it got really cold and wolves with thicker fur started living, while the thiner haired died-out, only thicker haired wolves would survive and thus wolves would get thicker fur. You can diverge (evolve in two different directions) if thin-haired wolves were better at surviving someplace else. There, thin-haired wolves might thrive.

    Humans and apes have a common anscestor. While both humans and apes still fill a niche, our common anscestor was likely replaced either by apes or humans which filled it better. This actually happened with Darwin’s finches. Several birds evolved from a common anscestor. Some adapted to crush large seeds, some to grasp tiny seeds. The one was able to eat large seeds better than the anscestor, the other able to eat tiny seeds better so they both remain, while the common anscestor was out-performed for both food sources, and is no longer.

  • Puppy
    Puppy Say (November 10, 2011 at 6:44 pm)

    This question has been asked so many times here it’s beyond annoying.

    Would it kill you to use search? Here, I’ll do it for you~

    http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result;_ylt=AvUWShMNioVXnxaS0gc7vjPpy6IX?p=why+are+there+still+monkeys+apes

  • nola_cajun
    nola_cajun Say (November 10, 2011 at 7:10 pm)

    everyones already said what needs to be said.. especially guy # 1 ..

    so evolution doesn’t happen in a straight line.. it branches out

Post Comment

Most Recent Articles from Biology Category:

Login Box

Please, enter user name and password to login to News and Articles

Forgot password?

Top Authors

Sydney Heeferlin (8 posts)
Gord McFee (6 posts)
giovanij12 (6 posts)
Amberly Carey (5 posts)
César Posadas (5 posts)